I am very disturbed by this…
July 20th, 2009
Home
> voting-page > I am very disturbed by this…
164 Responses to “I am very disturbed by this…”
Leave a Reply
Follow The Birdie
@picisunrelatedHotly Debated Posts
- I Will Haunt Your Dreams (195)
- Pickle Surprise! (189)
- I Am Irresistible (170)
- Lex Luther is just terrible (167)
- I am very disturbed by this... (164)
There is SO much wrong with this!
oh… dear lord O_o
Hey, kids gotta learn sometime.
dude… this is f**ked up. the girl is stroking the dad!
this is the Amish way to teach kids about the birds and the bees
Wasn’t one of these used by the title character in Brüno?
…in the future… I see… THERAPY!
WHY
I’m sad that you took four months to post my submission and that you put someone else’s name on it as the submitter.
A family that plays together, stays together!
OMG its the Aristocrats!!!!!!!!!!
@raznarukus
OMG it soo true lol
Hey, full-body merkins are making a comeback!
where the fuck is this??
Words…. fail….me…. holy crap!
… why are they so fluffy?
There’s something very, very wrong with this family.
Costume outtakes from Jim Carrey’s The Grinch Grows Up??? It’s like H. R. Puffinstuff disturbing.
This lot’s kids should have a sleepover with the Hitler doll girl.
This is probably the first time I’m actually floored by this site… totally WTF.
@clara agree!!!!! i have never been at such a loss lol
furries doing it wrong
I recently saw a video clip of this photographer somewhere. She comes around with this hand-knit naked outfits and then does family portraits:
http://www.videosift.com/video/Hand-Knit-Naked-Suits-Make-Great-Family-Photos
I don’t think it is bad.
OMG this is so WTF?! i agree with @Clara. also, lolz thats my name
I find it hillarious that they felt a need to blur out bits in the video clip.
yep… yeah… thats pretty disturbing!
what is the origin of this photo??
@S.
There’s a video clip of this crap? Ugh. This is why furries should not be allowed to procreate.
OLD
I Never normally comment, but this is SHOCKING and wrong, with the little girl touching daddies….Now i need a dose of Megan Fox to get this Sick photo out of my head.
*LMFHO* I laughed out loud and woke everyone up…
Seriously, throw their wooly asses in the warm water wash. They’ll be the size of Barbie and Ken when they come out.
Oh, and Daddy O was quite generous to himself when he knit his suit wasn’t he? I think he knit Momma’s boobies too.
forward this to CPS, quick!
Isn’t this a repost? Or maybe I saw it on failblog…
OMFG !!!
The mom’s kind of hot…
i was thinking wintery nudist colony…
@AnnaRexia
Those are not furries. This is more of naturist thing.
BTW, the FBI is on their way. Have a seat over there.
so wrong so unbelievably wrong.
Holy shit ! BUT still awesome.
Holy shit.
thank you, i am so glad that i am not the only person that thought, “winter wear for nudists, maybe?”
This is an art piece by Anna Maltz, who knitted these “nude suits” and others for an exhibition, One Size Fits All These people are not a family, they are professional models.
Nudists in winter!!
But that is so gross…
look at how small the boys penis is!
@Nene
Yeah, I can tell the little girl is touching daddy’s penis in a real professional way.
The little girl is grabbing her dad’s package. Isn’t there a law against that … even if the package is made of felt?
So that’s where that photo turned up. I’ve been looking for it everywhere.
Father will be pleased…
K I’ve seen a lot of WTF in my life, but my jaw actually dropped on this one. W. T. F. indeed.
She should have destroyed this photo instead of letting it get on the internet. It’s what I would have done.
I’d rather have seen knitted Superman in the wheelchair flexing at the motorbike.
Update already, damn you!
I’m all in favor of freedom of artistic expression and I generally give artists a lot of leeway with their subject matter, but anybody who shows a six-year-old girl playing with an adult male’s penis can not just use the excuse, “It’s art,” and say that everything’s okay. That’s just plain messed up.
All that being said, I thought the Aristocrats comment was hilarious.
Ah, I remember these characters on Sesame Street. They were great!
holy shit this is fucking disgusting
This poor little girl is now destin to a life in the porn industry. Tragic.
It starts getting weirder when you consider that someone had to buy the materials and stitch these outfits together. What kind of person would spend time on that endeavor? “Hey honey, it’s dinner time” “Be right there, I’m still sewing the ball sack onto the porn suit.” “Well, make sure you wash your hands after.”
OH GOD WHAT NO O.O WHY?
My first thought is “calm down, everyone.” No one is touching anyone’s penis.
There is a fetish about wearing full-body crocheted suits. You can find anything on the internet.
The little girl is not doing “porn.” Nobody is doing porn. Nobody is naked.
Fucking Americans.
@TJ
Something similar on failblog, but not this specifically. There was an asian girl in a suit like this with a penis, with a smug look on her face, awfully creepy…
so I take it you’re the best buds with the pedobear
@Hellbound Alleee
I agree, people are over reacting. The little girl isn’t touching a REAL penis and none of them are actually naked. Nothing about this is illegal, it’s just….really wtf.
this is so great in many ways.
…. WOW… o.O
Are you saying you don’t see anything wrong with this picture? In other words, if your neighbors next door were standing like this in the driveway you would not think anything of it? You are either lying or moron.
The dad looks Asian.
@Hellbound Alleee
Seriously? Calm Down? There’s a lot fetishes… like raping children, you sick bastard. How does that make this ok?
What you are, French?
I agree, people here should calm down.
First, no, there’s no law against this. Children are not forbidden to touch fake penises. It’s not even forbidden to allow them to see real ones, since naturism is not illegal…
Secondly, no, the girl won’t be traumatised by this, and has no destiny in the porn industry.
There is wtf in this picture, but nothing wrong.
Generally speaking, in countries where religion is separated from the state, what is forbidden is sexual contact or representations with children. Real nudity, representations of nudity, or contact with genitals in a non-sexual way is not illegal.
at least her tiny hands make his fake pink ape penis look HUGE!
Damn hippies.
Show me yours, I’ll show you mine. Oldest game in the world.
Mmmh, furry…
Why are they wearing shoes?
I’ve seen pictures from this series of images posted on a thousand blogs, all with the same strings of hysterical “WTF” comments, but I’ve never even ONCE seen the images attributed to the actual artist who made the suits.
Her name is Ana Maltz, and among other things, that set of suits is actually ABOUT the very prudishness & absolute squeamishness around NATURAL HUMAN NUDITY that always seems to be on display in these little ZOMG-fests you lot like to throw…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpscPtUkBzM
Seriously, y’all need to grow the f*ck up…
OMG WTF!!! doesn’t even cover it.
why are their ankles so thin?
they’re definitely related, they all have small feet, and a blurry aura around their skin.
kinda expecting a grinning E.T. to walk up to them, smoking a fat blunt.
This is too disturbing for words… Except, of course, “WHAT THE F#CK!?!?”
@simO)))
SimO FTW!
Honestly, the photo would be hilarious (in the fucking with the idea of covering ourselves to hide the naked form kind of way) if that little girl wasn’t gently cupping her dad’s furry shaft….
That’s my point exactly. My only problem with this is that the young girl is fondling the man’s penis. (Don’t freak out—I know it’s not his real penis). But even the representation of a kindergarten girl playing with her father’s (Calm down—I know it’s not really her dad) is pretty messed up. To those who said there’s nothing wrong with nudity—you’re right. But it’s not the representation of nudity thats the problem, it’s the representation of incestuous touching. That’s just icky.
WTF!!! WTFitude to the max. What is wrong with people?
i hope this his real penis is not inside that thing O_O
Heh, seen this pic before.
So let me get this straight; those of you who are saying that her touching a cloth penis is wrong also thinks that the model vagina boys play with in sex education class in high school is wrong because those boys are not of legal age?
No, wait, I’m sure your Christan day-schools don’t allow sex education…or thinking.
Boys get to play with model vaginas in sex education classes these days? Thats new, we only got shown how to put a condom on a banana and a strict talk about STDs.
@raznarukus
GET IT? THE ARISTOCRATS!
lol, good one.
@Schlake
Waaaaa! Waaaaa! Call the Waaaaaamulance!
The sad thing is, Anna Maltz probably got a grant from the NEA. In other words, our tax dollars paid for this “art”. The woman looks a lot like Mariska Hargitay! Eww.
@Dana
Actually, no, the sad thing is all you Broken Internet Children spending so much time on 4chan that you’ve warped your perceptions into seeing everything as kiddie-porn.
Plus, if I recall correctly, Anna Maltz actually did those suits while she was still in school, and bought all the materials with her own money.
So don’t worry: Your parent’s taxes aren’t paying for things that scare you, like, um, “art.”
@The What Now?
Incest is sexual relation between close family members. Incestuous touching has a direct sexual intent, and there’s none represented here.
@Dana
Were I a US citizen, i’d prefer having the governement pay some hundreds dollars for woolen suits to every demanding artist than billions for the army. Let’s put things in perspective here. Your tax dollars in this matter mean absolutely nothing.
omg…that girl is learning to be a slut!!
they should have made the son’s junk bigger..
@truthseeker
Thank goodness. But “my parent’s” taxes still pay for lots of other similar art, um, “crap”.
@Dana
It still isn’t as disturbing as an “art project” featuring pictures of a guy shitting into a jar. Art is subjective, but damn, that was some fucked-up stuff!
@Ohlol
Not a US citizen? Citizen of where? Germany? France? Netherlands? Italy? Or some other country that the army has liberated from oppression in the last century? It’s OK. If some dictator rolls you up in the next century, I’m sure we’ll bail you out again.
this shit aint legal you know
@Dana
Wow. I have an American flag, an apple pie, a noose, a “We don’t like gays, they are destroying the American family/ homosexuality is ok…only if the two girls are hot” bumper sticker, a cross, a bible to shove down in someone’s face, a Hummer/SUV, and a “America for Americans” t-shirt for you. I think all of that will match your hate and loathing very well.
Well put! <3
@Madame Blavatska
I believe I will need therapy after this trauma.
Wow, talk about jumping to conclusions.@MODOG
This is REALLY f*cked up…
@MODOG
Dude, that ain’t sex education class. That’s a completely different situation. If my daughter’s sex-ed teacher came into school wearing a fake penis and said to her, “Here, check this out. See what it feels like,” I’d put her in a different sex-ed class and have some harsh words for the teacher. I would, by the way, put my daughter in a sex-ed class at that age. I’m no prude, I just believe there’s a line that shouldn’t be crossed.
@Ohlol
And if you don’t think the man, woman, and two children in this photo are mean to represent a family, I strongly believe you’re misinterpreting the image. Think what you want, but if an artist shows us a man, a woman, a young boy, and a young girl, all standing together in a posed photo, I’m pretty sure we’re not supposed to think they’re a group of strangers.
I will allow for one possible scenario that would make this photo okay: The four actors are posing for the pic, standing straight and looking into the camera. Then the little girl turns around of her own accord and grabs the male actors fake penis, saying, “Hey, what’s this?” The man is slightly embarrassed and responds along the lines of, “Oh, you probably shouldn’t touch that,” which explains the smile on his face. If that’s what happened here, then it’s just a humorous outtake from the photo shoot. But if this was the intended image and the photographer said, “Okay, little girl, now take the man’s penis in your hand,” then it crosses a line that I personally believe shouldn’t be crossed.
So those are my feelings on this photo in as much detail as I can express them. I’m not being reactionary and I’m certainly not going to rail against the NEA—tax dollars should support art and culture as much as they support anything else.
Brüno was running around Berlin, Germany with the same suit while promoting his movie. See a pic here:
http://www.berlinonline.de/berliner-zeitung/foto/_bin/index.php/Berliner+Zeitung/brueno_in_berlin/12
What I learn from this picture is white people’s skin is pink.
i think this is quite a special and magical family moment. SO JUST BACK OFF WILL YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!??????!!!!!!!!! jesus!
“Normal” shoes? What’s a good wool anatomically correct suit if you’re not going to have feet?
Go big or go home, people.
what the hell… this is wrong in so many ways… OMG.
This is so sick and disturbing,what the hell was they thinking of?They should be locked up!
Umm… yeah, I’ve got nothing to say.
Brings a new meaning to MILF. Mother I’d like to Furry.
@The What Now?
They’re probably a family, I’ve seen a short film about the artist that showed her making another family pose. Fun fact was that the editor blurred the suits. But anyway that was not my point, I don’t think the link between these people matter.
My point is that nothing sexual is occurring in this pic. And also that the woolen penis is not evil, it doesn’t corrupt any who touches it – and I do think that insinuating that it does is to give way to a effectively reactionnary idea about sexuality and about what can it be associated with, and that your beliefs are not personnal ones (as if such things could be personnal) but a christian hangover.
Children are curious about what is usually hidden and I suppose the kid wasn’t told to touch it. But even if that was the case, it wouldn’t be of any consequence.
@Dana
I’m from a country that used its ICBM, aircraft carriers, submarines, jet fighters and bombers to fight its own dictators in the last century. Oh wait, no, in fact all those were never used.
WHAT THE FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF***!?
@Jason
and why, *ahem*, are you looking at boy-penis?
OMG! Those children came out of that woman’s vagina!!! They TOUCHED her VAGINA!
INCEST!!!!
@Ohlol I agree, completely. Nudity =/= sexuality or sex. The end.
@Dana: You *do* realize that America hasn’t actually fought in every war in every country that ever was, single handedly saving the populace from “evil” Ultimate Showdown-style, right? Right?!? (*please* say yes)
Honestly, if Bush *needed* to fight a war with a country that Bin Laden *wasn’t* hiding in, he should’ve sent troops to Darfur to stop the genocide still taking place. But I guess all those refugees needed to have some oil fields before America would save them, huh?
@Ohlol
I find the conclusions you are jumping to very interesting. First off, I’m not Christian. I’m not even religious. People are able to have personal beliefs that are not molded by a religious philosophy. That being said, I still hold that if this photo was directed to be a shot of a little girl holding a man’s penis, it’s messed up. However, I do not believe that’s what it was. Children are, as you point out, extremely curious about such things. I know, I have two kids. The thing is dangling there at eye level, the kid probably just saw it and decided to see what it felt like. This is not a sexual photograph. More than anything, it’s kind of silly. Did I have a knee-jerk reaction it it when I first saw it? Yes. Probably based on overprotectiveness of my own daughter. Did you have a knee-jerk reaction to my comments? Yes. Probably based on pre-existing notions of Americans and Christianity. By the way, I want you to know there is not animosity in my comments to you. I’ve actually found this a rather lively discussion.
Individually, they put a lot of thought into their footwear to match the Angora Anatomically Semi-Correct suits.
Ahem … sounds like it … Just don’t take it so personal, ‘K? Thanks! Jesus love you
@AFtERBIRtH33
uhhh…
who gives a fuck?
you have ruined the picture with your seriousness
What a terrible family photos hehehehe
@AFtERBIRtH33
And I love Jesus. Just not in THAT way.
@Reversetelevision
You’re right. Let’s stop being serious. Here’s what I should have posted way back in the beginning:
When these folks get a Brazilian, it REALLY hurts.
Mother-of-God
ok..
1. the daughter is fondling the dad.
2. the mom has a huge bush.
3. the dads chest hair looks like an ink-blot test.
4. only the son is laughing
5. a. they are all wearing shoes.
b. the daughter has rain boots.
6. the mom’s boobs look like cones
id go on… but i need to go be sick now.
That’s Sexy. The little girl is acctually fondling her dad under the suit. She is gonna be a prosititue when she is older. That picture can make some one very horny.
SEXYYY!!!
Wow, this discussion was very, very close to bring Hitler to the scene, Iam giving 10 Internets to the first of you who put down when it was!
someone hurry up and photoshop Pedobear into that picture!
I don’t even know where to begin with this…
-That such costumes exist in family edition for entire families
-that they sell
-That people wear them outdoors
-The father/daughter action going on there
@Hellbound Alleee
Are you denoting this creepiness by saying it’s ALL OVER THE INTERNET?
Ohhh, okay I get it those parents just have fetishes for wearing naked costumes that they’re pushing on their children!
Ahh, I get it, now it’s okay.
Thank ya kind stranger.
it would be ok if it were just the adults
but the kids!
who the f**k would do something like this
@Hellbound Alleee
So if the man “pretends” to finger the little girl, it’s OK, right, but cause he’s not really doing it. And if he “pretends” f*ck the little girl, it’s ok because he’s not really doing it, right?
Fucking Europeans
@Dana
Y’know, as a citizen of a country (Canada) that fought in two World Wars at the beginning and not just when it became clear who the winner was, I get a little tired of the USA acting like they single handedly won either of those wars. As for all the “dictators” the US government got rid of in South America, ask a Chilean how they felt about being “liberated” by Pinochet. I for one hope never to be “liberated” of my oil, or water, by my southerly neighbour.
What the shit is this?
@The What Now?
There’s no one here playing with genitals. The father is wearing a full-body-coverage suit. The child is playing with some interesting bits of that suit (and, incidentally, they are the easy part for her to get to; could have something to do with it). I agree this is totally (as someone above put it) W. T. F. But not illegal. After watching a video of another family, I’m thinking the kids will have a good laugh about this as well as their parents.
LOL! I was wondering what was wrong with my skin all these years!
@Anna
To “The What Now?”
I’ve now read your later posts, so I’d be obliged if you would ignore mine from a few minutes ago — Thanks!
@Christian
that… i dont even know how to describe that. Other than WTF?????
why doesn’t the man have hairy legs?
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.MAKE IT GO AWAY!
Yeah I’m hungry for some burgers.. fur burgers.
I am scared for life and now think i may be a homosexual…….
has anyone thought this was an “oops” shot, and that the girl isn’t supposed to be touching that?
@kosher ham
I was wondering the same thing, glad someone else caught that too
@L@$^
Apparently, that some one(should be one word by the way) is you, you sick son of a bitch
@Guy Smiley
You make an excellent point, I agree. There is nothing good about a little girl touching her dad’s genitalia or vice-versa, whether its fake or real.
The Mom is totally do-able. I want to see her real birthday suit.
what. the. fuck?
@Final Judge of WTF
Seriously though – in what way is this in any way sexual? The little girl is just curious – surely you as a child asked your parents about their genitals? Why are Americans so repressed? (assuming you are american) – this is a family picture, and not documenting incest. Why do you think that they would stand on their driveway like that? It’s just nudity, and it’s not even that. Are you afraid of your own body? I just think it’s funny…
Two words:
Mach Three.
Although I agree that children have to learn about sex sometime, this is certainly not the way to go about it. The daughter touching the fake penis just makes it harder to look at. *shudder*
OK, ijits like Dana in no way represent this American’s views.
I blame our piss-poor education system.
@flyguy
Really, FlyGuy? You say how bad this picture is, and how that girl should not be touching her father’s FAKE genitals, then you say that you want to see the mother naked? You should really change your name to “Hypocritical Asshole.”
It pisses me off that Americans (of which I am one) actually find something wrong with this picture. Almost every other country has nude beaches or just plain naked people walking around, and yet Americans think that you need to be 17 just to glimpse breasts in a movie. It’s not like that girl is thinking sexual thoughts, she is just curious.
50% of the world has seen a penis from day one, and the other 50% has seen a vagina from day one. Anyone who thinks that to even see a sexual organ that isn’t attached to you until your 20 is in idiot. Anyone with a computer has access to porn, which basically means that 100% of people with computers (which is a of of people) have seen not only breasts, a penis, and a vagina, but have actually seen them used in sexual acts.
Oh, and Guy Smiley? A little girl seeing a fake penis and touching it is not the same as a grown pubescent man pretending to fuck a little girl.
at lest they are wearing shoes
This makes me laugh because people find nothing wrong with a little girl in this situation.
And it’s not even terrible that a little girl is curiously touching something hanging off her dad’s clothes as she probably doesn’t even know what it is. What’s really wrong with this picture is that the dad looks like he actually likes it.
(GOOD message) Hopefully there being raised no’ing good and proper sex,(good birds and bees) and maybe the GLP won’t get their hooks into them like they’ve done everywhere else.Oh yea,their actors,sorry,God I love the 1st amendment–
I you people used your brain, youd find the tre meaning of these clothes. It shows your not to be afraid of who you are. I, for one, really think these are interesting.
This is a picture title “The Bashful Nudists” by Mitch Cumstein
It’s just like the British royal family.
Will they adopt me?
Aaaa…my eyes….!
I laughed when I saw this and went and checked out the video
http://www.videosift.com/video/Hand-Knit-Naked-Suits-Make-Great-Family-Photos
and I smiled at the sweet innocence and the quirky humour of this entire concept. This isn’t sexual .We come from a culture that is clothed and so this seems really shocking to some of you .Obviously in reality you can’t have a child touching an adults penis in a significant way BUT I think this was just a moment of curiosity and rather insignificant . A knitted penis at eye level invites investigation and It isn’t the same as the real thing.
Why won’t they just be naked?
BTW… I’m really disturbed by this o.o
Whatever! just keep that to yourself in you own house…
This is indeed very WTF. but seriously, chill out, people!
The worst part is that someone in the world is probably fapping to this.
Bizzaro Sasquatch family?
What? Why. why.
All of the oh too serious replies ruined the funny. I guess as an artist I understand the context. A couple of people got it as well. The little girl proboably wondered what the fake peins was because none of any other pair of pants she has seen had that sewn to the front. Curiousity nothing more. If she would’ve been close to the mommy she proboably would’ve touched the bush. Kids are curious, and when something looks odd or out of place they investigate it.